AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2013 >> [2013] ELECD 699

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Yan, Lin --- "Rethinking the NPC Standing Committee’s basic law revision power" [2013] ELECD 699; in Shi, Jichun (ed), "Renmin Chinese Law Review" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013) 93

Book Title: Renmin Chinese Law Review

Editor(s): Shi, Jichun

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781782544340

Section: Chapter 5

Section Title: Rethinking the NPC Standing Committee’s basic law revision power

Author(s): Yan, Lin

Number of pages: 13

Abstract/Description:

In recent years, the National People’s Congress Standing Committee’s (‘NPCSC’ hereinafter) exercise of the basic law revision power has often been a topic of academic dispute. For instance, in 2008, legal scholars disputed whether the NPCSC could revise the Criminal Procedure Act by amending the Lawyers Law. In 2010, the issue of whether the NPCSC could have the authority to revise the People’s Representatives Law (‘PRL’ hereinafter) was also hotly debated. Some law professors argued that the NPCSC could not be allowed to amend the PRL, and it should be changed by the NPC itself. Others challenged that it is impossible to prevent the NPCSC from revising the PRL, since the Constitution has clearly authorized it to revise basic laws and the PRL is absolutely a basic law. Although the NPCSC eventually did adopt the revised bill, it is still worth pondering the rationality of the exercise of the basic law revision power, as well as the relationship between the NPC and its standing committee.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2013/699.html