AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2016 >> [2016] ELECD 510

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Ligeti, Katalin --- "The European Public Prosecutor’s Office" [2016] ELECD 510; in Mitsilegas, Valsamis; Bergström, Maria; Konstadinides, Theodore (eds), "Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016) 480

Book Title: Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law

Editor(s): Mitsilegas, Valsamis; Bergström, Maria; Konstadinides, Theodore

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781783473304

Section: Chapter 23

Section Title: The European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Author(s): Ligeti, Katalin

Number of pages: 25

Abstract/Description:

In July 2013, the European Commission presented its Proposal to set up the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). Meanwhile negotiations are ongoing in the Council. The Commission’s Proposal represents a seminal change in developing the EU criminal justice area: in order to fight offences affecting the financial interests of the European Union a European law enforcement body would be set up. Instead of cooperation of national judicial authorities, the Commission’s Proposal would install genuine European powers of investigation and prosecution in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ). This chapter gives a brief overview of the history of the idea of the EPPO and of the legal framework and the procedure laid down in Article 86 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) for its establishment. It discusses the main features of the Commission’s Proposal, highlighting the controversial provisions and summarizing the main arguments. As the negotiations are still ongoing at the time of writing, the central elements of the draft text discussed in the Council are outlined. The concluding remarks take into account the current outcome of the negotiations and aim to assess whether the intended changes are in line with the constitutional objectives of the Treaty and would represent an added value compared to the present background of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2016/510.html