AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2020 >> [2020] ELECD 30

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Karapapa, Stavroula --- "Exhaustion of rights on digital content under EU copyright: positive and normative perspectives" [2020] ELECD 30; in Aplin, Tanya (ed), "Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020) 483

Book Title: Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Digital Technologies

Editor(s): Aplin, Tanya

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

Section: Chapter 24

Section Title: Exhaustion of rights on digital content under EU copyright: positive and normative perspectives

Author(s): Karapapa, Stavroula

Number of pages: 23

Abstract/Description:

Although the distribution right, under EU copyright, is exhausted after the first sale of works in the EEA with the rightholders’ consent, exhaustion does not apply to the right of communicating works to the public and hence to the online resale of digital goods. This impacts on consumer welfare and market economy as it does not allow the development of secondary markets for digital goods. However, two cases of the Court of Justice, UsedSoft and Svensson, leave the question of ‘digital’ exhaustion open. Should digital exhaustion apply and, if so, to what extent would this be normatively feasible? In anticipation of the Tom Kabinet judgment, which is expected to shed light on these questions, this chapter argues that there would be much to be gained from ensuring that the traditional benefits of the exhaustion principle are preserved online. Exhaustion has longstanding benefits in protecting the EU freedoms of movement, ensuring access, enhancing competition and innovation and enabling transactional freedom. Despite these benefits, there are normative impediments to the application of digital exhaustion, mostly because the notion of exhaustion is attached to tangibility. These may be overcome through a purposive understanding of tangibility, leading in certain cases to a meaningful equivalent of ownership of content in the online environment.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2020/30.html