AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Legal Education Digest

Legal Education Digest
You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Legal Education Digest >> 2009 >> [2009] LegEdDig 33

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Author Info | Download | Help

Bjornstol, E P --- "Human rights law education in China" [2009] LegEdDig 33; (2009) 17(3) Legal Education Digest 8


Human rights law education in China

E Bjornstol

1 Web J of Current Legal Issues, 2009, pp1–9.

2008 marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Universal Declaration has had widespread influence, and all international human rights legal instruments adopted since then elaborate the principles of the Universal Declaration. All countries in the world have engaged with the Universal Declaration in one way or another. The Preamble of the Universal Declaration encourages the promotion of respect for the rights and freedoms set out in the Universal Declaration through teaching and education.

2008 also marks the 30th anniversary of the opening up and reform policy of the Chinese government and there has been remarkable development both in the legal system and in the legal education system in China in the last thirty years. While the Chinese government was very vocal against human rights law in the early 1990s, it now engages directly with the values of the Universal Declaration and with human rights law issues. Since the beginning of the new century there has also been a considerable growth in human rights law courses offered in law schools in China’s elite universities. The Norwegian Centre for Human Rights (NCHR) has, together with the other Nordic human rights institutes ie. the Raoul Wallenberg Institute for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (RWI) and the Danish Institute of Human Rights (DIHR), been involved in providing training courses for human rights law teachers in China. This article will provide an overview of legal human rights education in China and discuss the possible impact of such education.

After massive international human rights critique following the official crackdown on the Chinese democracy movement in 1989, the Chinese government started endorsing domestic human rights research. Input was needed on how to respond to the critique and the Chinese government sought to develop a theoretical position on human rights that could justify their policies. In 1991 the Chinese government published the first Human Rights in China white paper where they interpreted Chinese laws in terms of human rights. The white paper defined the government’s view on human rights and placed much emphasis on the right to subsistence and economic development as necessary for the enjoyment of human rights. In this period more research on human rights therefore started to emerge, and several academic human rights research centres were opened. There was little focus on international human rights law per se. In the middle of the 1990s the human rights discourse between China and Western countries became less confrontational and there was more focus on diplomacy and dialogue. This opened up possibilities for foreign donors to start cooperation projects on human rights issues in China. The academic China programmes at the NCHR, the RWI and the DIHR became involved in capacity building activities on international human rights law for Chinese legal researchers from the mid nineties.

The Chinese government has continued to engage with international human rights law since the early 1990s. In addition to participating in human rights dialogues with Western countries, China has now ratified six international UN conventions of international human rights law. In 2004 the National People’s Congress amended Article 33 of the Chinese Constitution in order to include the sentence: ‘the State respects and safeguards human rights’ and in 2006 China became a member of the new UN Human Rights Council.

Although China is engaging with human rights, there are still many problems that need to be addressed. Consistent with their initial definition of human rights in 1991, the Chinese government has for example focused mostly on economic development, welfare and poverty reduction issues. Civil society and human rights activists are still strictly controlled and although the legal system has developed considerably in the last 30 years the legal protection of individuals is still weak because there are huge problems in the implementation of laws locally. Still, in a historical perspective the opening up process has been remarkable and there is much more freedom in China today than 30 years ago. This trend can also be seen in the legal field where the legal system and legal education has had remarkable progress.

The planning of formal legal education in China is done by the Ministry of Education (MoE), and an 11th five-year plan for legal education is now in effect. By the end of 1993, China had 135 regular colleges/departments of law and 114 continuing higher educational schools of law. The number had risen significantly by the end of 2006. By then, 603 institutions were offering bachelor’s degrees in law, and nearly 300,000 students majored in law each year. 333 institutions were also entitled to offer masters degrees in law and 29 institutions could offer doctorates in law. In addition to changes in the number of legal educational institutions and students, the structure of legal education has changed significantly in the last 30 years. During the 1980s and 1990s Chinese law schools divided students on bachelor level into various speciality programmes like criminal justice, economic law etc. Each speciality had its own special course settings. There are now two routes in Chinese legal education: the traditional way for academic lawyers which includes LLB of four years, LLM for three years and the possibility of taking a JSD for three years. The other route is for practising lawyers and includes three kinds of tracks, either a LLB for four years for law related jobs, a LLB for four years and one year of professional training for legal practice or a regular bachelor degree in a non-law field for four years and then a JM.

Since the early 1990s, human rights law was taught at some law schools as a small component of legal subjects like international law, jurisprudence or constitutional law. Human rights law was not taught as an independent course by itself at any Chinese law schools however. This changed when the Chinese MoE in 2001 issued a Notice that human rights law was to be included in the list of approved elective courses for law schools in China. Human rights law was now placed as number 15 in the Ministry of Education list, just after the 14 required law courses. Scholars have thus expected that human rights law would be included as a required core course in Chinese law schools in the near future. There was considerable interest in human rights issues among legal scholars in China in 2001, but no legal institutions had the qualified teachers, teaching capacity or indeed teaching materials to start offering such optional human rights law courses for their students.

The Nordic institutions are the only foreign institutions which have focused systematically on the training of human rights teachers in China. While the Nordic institutes have cooperated on some human rights education projects, they have also developed their own individual human rights education projects that in many ways complement rather than compete with each other. The joint objectives of their human rights education activities in China has been to increase the knowledge of international human rights law standards and teaching methodology among law teachers in China so as to facilitate both the start up of human rights law courses and the incorporation of international human rights law standards into already existing courses on international law, constitutional law or jurisprudence.

From 2001 to 2007 the Nordic institutes have supported seven annual two-week courses in international human rights law for law teachers in China. Interested law teachers from all over China could apply for the courses and approximately 25 participants were selected on a competitive basis to attend each course and many of the teachers attended several annual courses. Many participants in the first courses had never studied international human rights law before. In the beginning well known foreign human rights experts came from abroad to teach in the courses since there were no available teachers in China who had the knowledge or expertise to teach the participants. This situation has changed somewhat. After extensive studies and research both in China and abroad, several Chinese scholars have now become experts on international human rights law or on specific human rights topics. In the last courses many Chinese scholars thus lectured for the Chinese law teachers.

In addition to such joint training activities, several of the Nordic institutions organised complimentary individual activities. The NCHR has since 2005 organised an annual two-week international human rights law course in the less developed part of Western China. They saw the need to specifically target law teachers from those regions in order to strengthen human rights education and research at law schools in the Western provinces of China. The joint Nordic sponsored teacher courses had become too advanced and the competition to attend was so fierce that participants from Western China had become underrepresented. Many of the experts providing the training in these international human rights courses in Western China have been Chinese human rights law experts. Many of the law teachers participating in these trainings have now attended several annual courses and some have now already opened courses in their home universities in Western China.

A total of more than 200 Chinese law teachers have now been trained in international human rights law by the Nordic institutions, they have come from 76 different institutions in China and from 25 provinces or province level municipalities. Many of these teachers are today active in teaching human rights law and the number of law schools where independent human rights law courses are opened is constantly increasing. When the Nordic institutions started training law teachers in 2001 there were no independent courses in international human rights law. In 2003, 13 universities had opened courses and today there are more than 30 universities offering human rights law courses in China.

The optional human rights law courses that are offered at Chinese universities vary in focus and in length, but most are organised into 36 hours of lectures. There are optional courses on human rights law on both bachelor and master level, but not all universities offer both types of human rights law courses. In order to further encourage and strengthen networking and cooperation between Chinese law schools in the field of human rights education and research however, the Nordic institutes have from 2008 sponsored an annual three-day network meeting of some 60 Chinese human rights teachers. These meetings are organised by the human rights teachers themselves and provide a forum where scholars who are already teaching human rights courses can exchange and discuss experiences and plans regarding curriculum development and teaching methodology and also discuss the future development of legal human rights education in China.

There is no common curriculum on human rights law in China as of yet and in the start there was a lack of teaching materials available in Chinese language. The NCHR in cooperation with the Chinese University of Political Science and Law and the Foreign Affairs College developed and published the first Chinese language textbook on international human rights law in 2002. The NCHR then donated more than 3000 copies of the textbook to university libraries all over China so that it would be available to students and the book is on sale in all major bookstores. Since then, at least four more university textbooks on human rights law have been published. Not all textbooks focus on international human rights law, some focus more on the theoretical developments of the human rights concept or on cases. There is therefore not one comprehensive Chinese textbook that cover all the complicated aspects of human rights law and many law teachers thus use several textbooks in their teaching. Human rights teachers in China are concerned with developing the best possible curriculum for their teachers and thus also spend much time gathering other material for their students. Interactive teaching methods like UN role plays, moot courts and practical experiences like legal aid etc are also used.

In addition to the regular 36 hour optional courses in human rights law offered at some 30 universities, there are some other interesting international human rights law education activities at the law schools at Peking University, at the Chinese University of Political Science and Law and at Changchun University.

Supported by the RWI, the Research Centre for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law at the Peking University Law School started a Research Direction in human rights law for Master students in 2004, when the Research Centre got approval to add a research direction of human rights to one of the already existing research directions under the LLM programmes. The human rights direction is taken over three semesters and approximately 20 students have been enrolled each year.

The Institute for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law at the Law Faculty of the Chinese University of Political Science and Law in Beijing started a three year research direction under the MA programme in Jurisprudence in 2005. In 2007 it became a full degree programme and now offers both a Master degree and a PhD in human rights law. This degree programme is funded solely by Chinese sources and is the only existing full degree programme in human rights law in China.

The North-East Normal University in Changchun is establishing an interdisciplinary, optional and credit-giving course in human rights for third and fourth year students in 2009. The project will be funded by the Royal Dutch Embassy in Beijing, but implemented by DIHR and carried out by a network of universities in Changchun.

There have been very few general studies on the impact of university human rights law education although there has been a rapid growth of such education all over the world since the middle of the 1990s. In China, where human rights law education emerged even later there has been even less research on such issues.

One very visible effect of all the different legal human rights education activities in China is of course that more and more students receive human rights training, that more and more law teachers are trained in how to teach human rights law, that more and more law teachers actually do teach human rights law and that more and more law schools now offer human rights law courses. These increasing numbers are in themselves a remarkable change from when there was no human rights law teaching in China. Human rights law is gradually becoming a separate field of legal education in China and a group of committed Chinese human rights teachers have emerged.

While the overall objectives of the Nordic involvement in human rights education in China is to contribute to strengthened human rights teaching, there is also a long-term goal of wider social change and the improvement of human rights protection. It is of course much more difficult to determine that human rights education may have such societal impact.

Jessica Yeh has interviewed most of the students participating in the international human rights law master courses at Peking University (approximately 80 students) and China University of Political Science and Law (approximately 20 students). What she found was that while both study programmes have produced considerable mental impact and changes in attitudes among the students, this potential may be lost in the future because the wider institutional context in China provides no opportunities for human rights activities. Law students from other universities following optional 36 hour law courses in human rights law were not part of the study so it is difficult to know whether it is possible to generalise these results or not.

It is of course always a problem to predict where students will end up and there are definitely very few direct human rights work opportunities in China. There is a sense however that it is still too early to tell what the influence on human rights law students may be. If human rights law courses become mandatory core courses, then all future law students will receive human rights training. A whole new generation of lawyers and legal scholars who have all studied human rights law may have much better possibilities for career and institutional impact than the few students who take human rights law as an optional course.

For the NCHR the rationale behind the focus on training of law teachers instead of directly training students has been one of sustainability. By educating the educators, the dissemination of knowledge about international human rights law may be more stable and effective and thus reach even more students in the long run. The potential these educators from elite universities have for influencing the education of the future generation of legal workers and legal scholars is unique.

In addition to their important role as educators, many human rights law teachers also conduct their own research and publish articles and books on human rights law issues on a regular basis thus disseminating knowledge about human rights law not only to their students but also to the wider academia, to policy makers and to the general public.

Human rights law is gradually becoming a legitimate field of legal education and there is now a group of committed human rights teachers in China who not only teach human rights law, but who also participate in policy reform debates and act as advisors to the Chinese government. These teachers will shape the future of human rights education in China and it will be interesting to see whether future students will be able to make use of their knowledge about human rights in more concrete ways and whether human rights law will become a core obligatory course for all law students. The Chinese society is changing rapidly and future generations of legal scholars and practitioners will be expected to adapt to these changes. It is important to remember that there are still enormous problems in implementation of the rule of law in China because of human rights violations, corruption within the legal system and lack of legal education of judges and police. Future legal scholars and practitioners will have to deal with all of these problems, and a background in human rights law will be extremely useful for this endeavour.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/LegEdDig/2009/33.html