AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series

Faculty of Law, UNSW
You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series >> 2013 >> [2013] UNSWLRS 26

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Author Info | Download | Help

Greenleaf, Graham --- "China's NPC Standing Committee Privacy Decision: A Small Step, Not a Great Leap Forward" [2013] UNSWLRS 26

Last Updated: 18 April 2013

China's NPC Standing Committee Privacy Decision: A Small Step, Not a Great Leap Forward


Graham Greenleaf, University of New South Wales

This paper is available for download at Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2172123

Citation

This paper was published in Privacy Laws & Business International Report, Issue 121, February 2013, 1 and 4-6. This paper may also be referenced as [2013] UNSWLRS 26.

Abstract

The Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPC Standing Committee) of December 28, 2012 concerning data privacy and the internet (‘2012 Decision’) is the highest level law yet enacted in China to deal specifically with data protection issues. This article analyses that Decision, comparing its content with the MIIT Regulation directed at the same IISPs, and covering much of the same ground (see G Greenleaf ‘China's Internet Data Privacy Regulations 2012: 80 Percent of a Great Leap Forward?’ available at <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2049232> ).

The conclusion is reached that, other than that this Decision comes from the high platform of the Standing Committee of the NPC, it is not obvious that it constitutes ‘far-reaching requirements’ or ‘a great step forward,’ as some authors have suggested – at least not in the direction of a comprehensive data privacy law (even in relation to the Internet). It is missing essential principles (access and correction; deletion/de-identification; and data export limitations), and ambiguous on others (finality and collection limitations). However, the strong requirement on opting out from direct marketing, the clearer right to seek civil damages for breach, and the extension of obligations on State agencies, do add to the requirements in the Regulation published one year earlier.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLRS/2013/26.html