Australian Capital Territory Current Acts Australian Capital Territory Current Acts(1) This section applies in a criminal proceeding if a person who made a previous representation is not available to give evidence about an asserted fact.
(2) The hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation that is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the representation being made, if the representation—
(a) was made under a duty to make that representation or to make representations of that kind; or
(b) was made when or shortly after the asserted fact happened and in circumstances that make it unlikely that the representation is a fabrication; or
(c) was made in circumstances that make it highly probable that the representation is reliable; or
(d) was—
(i) against the interests of the person who made it at the time it was made; and
(ii) made in circumstances that make it likely that the representation is reliable.
Note Section 67 imposes notice requirements relating to this subsection.
(3) The hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of a previous representation made in the course of giving evidence in an Australian or overseas proceeding if, in the proceeding, the defendant in the proceeding to which this section is being applied—
(a) cross-examined the person who made the representation about it; or
(b) had a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the representation about it.
Note Section 67 imposes notice requirements relating to this subsection.
(4) If there is more than 1 defendant in the criminal proceeding, evidence of a previous representation that—
(a) is given in an Australian or overseas proceeding; and
(b) is admitted into evidence in the criminal proceeding because of subsection (3);
cannot be used against a defendant who did not cross-examine, and did not have a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine, the person about the representation.
(5) For subsection (3) and subsection (4), a defendant is taken to have had a reasonable opportunity to cross-examine a person if the defendant was not present at a time when the cross-examination of a person might have been conducted but—
(a) could reasonably have been present at the time; and
(b) if present could have cross-examined the person.
(6) Evidence of the making of a representation to which subsection (3) applies may be presented by producing a transcript, or a recording, of the representation that is authenticated by—
(a) the person to whom, or the court or other body to which, the representation was made; or
(b) if applicable, the registrar or other proper officer of the court or other body to which the representation was made; or
(c) the entity responsible for producing the transcript or recording.
(7) Without limiting subsection (2) (d), a representation is taken for subsection (2) (d) to be against the interests of the person who made it if it tends—
(a) to damage the person's reputation; or
(b) to show that the person has committed an offence for which the person has not been convicted; or
(c) to show that the person is liable in an action for damages.
(8) The hearsay rule does not apply to—
(a) evidence of a previous representation presented by a defendant if the evidence is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the representation being made; or
(b) a document tendered as evidence by a defendant so far as it contains a previous representation, or another representation to which it is reasonably necessary to refer in order to understand the representation.
Note Section 67 imposes notice requirements relating to this subsection.
(9) If evidence of a previous representation about a matter has been presented by a defendant and has been admitted, the hearsay rule does not apply to evidence of another representation about the matter that—
(a) is presented by another party; and
(b) is given by a person who saw, heard or otherwise perceived the other representation being made.
Note The dictionary, pt 2, s 4 is about the availability of people.