Commonwealth Numbered Regulations - Explanatory Statements

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]


CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT REGULATION 2012 (NO. 8) (SLI NO 192 OF 2012)

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Select Legislative Instrument 2012 No. 192

 

 

Issued by the authority of the Attorney-General

 

 Criminal Code Act 1995

 

Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8)

 

 

Section 5 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.  The Schedule to the Act sets out the Criminal Code (the Code).

 

Division 102 of the Code sets out the offences in relation to terrorist organisations, which are: directing the activities of a terrorist organisation; being a member of a terrorist organisation; recruiting persons to a terrorist organisation; receiving training from or providing training to a terrorist organisation; being an associate of and receiving funds from or making available funds, support or resources to a terrorist organisation.

 

Offences in Division 102 of the Code apply to conduct (or the results of such conduct) constituting the alleged offence whether or not the conduct (or the result) occurs in Australia.

 

A 'terrorist organisation' is defined in subsection 102.1(1) of the Code as:

 

The purpose of the regulation is to amend the Criminal Code Regulations 2002
(Criminal Code Regulations) to specify Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, also known as al Mansooreen, al Mansoorian, Army of Medina, Army of the Pure, Army of the Pure and Righteous, Army of the Righteous, Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation, Idara Khidmat-e-Khalq, Jama'at al-Dawa, Jama'at-i-Dawat, Jamaati-ud-Dawa, Jamaat ud-Daawa, Jama'at-ud-Da'awa, Jama'at-ud-Da'awah, Jamaat-ud-Dawa, Jama'at ul-Da'awa, Jamaat-ul-Dawa, Jamaat ul-Dawah, Jamaiat-ud-Dawa, JuD, JUD, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, Lashkar-e-Toiba, Lashkar-i-Tayyaba, Lashkar-i-Toiba, Lashkar-Tayyiba, LeT, LT, Paasban-e-Ahle-Hadis, Paasban-e-Kashmir, Paasban-i-Ahle-Hadith, Party of the Calling, Party of Preachers, Pasban-e-Ahle-Hadith, Pasban-e-Kashmir, Soldiers of the Pure and Tehreek-e-Tahafuz Qibla Awal, for the purpose of paragraph (b) of the definition of 'terrorist organisation' in subsection 102.1(1) of the Code. 

 

The regulation enables the offence provisions in Division 102 of the Code to continue to apply to persons with links to Lashkar-e-Tayyiba.  Details of the regulation are set out in Attachment A.

 

Subsection 102.1(2) of the Code provides that before the Governor-General makes regulations specifying an organisation for the purposes of paragraph (b) of the definition of 'terrorist organisation' in subsection 102.1(1) of the Code, the Minister must be satisfied on reasonable grounds that the organisation is engaged in, preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act (whether or not a terrorist act has occurred or will occur) or advocates the doing of a terrorist act (whether or not a terrorist act has occurred or will occur).

 

The Minister must arrange for the Leader of the Opposition in the House of Representatives to be briefed in relation to the regulation pursuant to subsection 102.1(2A).

 

In determining whether she is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the organisation is engaged in, preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act, the Minister takes into consideration an unclassified Statement of Reasons prepared by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) in consultation with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, as well as advice from the Australian Government Solicitor.  The Statement of Reasons in respect of Lashkar-e-Tayyiba is at Attachment B.

 

Prior to making the regulation, consultations were held with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, ASIO and the Australian Government Solicitor.  In addition, the Attorney-General wrote to the Premiers and Chief Ministers of the States and Territories on behalf of the Prime Minister, and the Attorney-General offered the Leader of the Opposition a briefing.

 

The regulation is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

The regulation commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.  Subsection 102.1(3) of the Code provides that regulations for the purposes of paragraph (b) of the definition of 'terrorist organisation' cease to have effect on the third anniversary of the day on which they take effect.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

 

This regulation is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Objective

 

The object of the Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) is to protect national security, public safety and the rights and freedoms of persons within and outside of Australia.  This will engage the inherent right to life expressed in Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). 

 

The object of the regulation also engages Article 19 and Article 22 of the ICCPR.  Whilst Article 19 protects the right to freedom of expression, this right may be subject to restrictions which include protecting national security.  The right to freedom of association in Article 22 of the ICCPR protects the right to form and join associations to pursue common goals, such as political parties.  Article 22(2) provides that freedom of association may be subject to restrictions imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order, the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

 

The Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) makes it an offence under Division 102 of the Criminal Code, to direct the activities, become a member of, recruit, train or receiving training, get funds to, from or for Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, and provide support or associate with Lashkar-e-Tayyiba. 

 

The offence in subsection 102.8 of the Criminal Code of associating with a terrorist organisation is limited in its application only to an organisation that is a listed organisation under Criminal Code Regulations.  The offence does not apply if the association is with a close family member, or takes place in the course of practising a religion in a place used for public religious worship, or the association is for the purpose of providing humanitarian aid or for the purpose of providing legal advice or representation. 

 

Whilst the Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) may limit the right to freedom of association with Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, the association offence is subject to the safeguards outlined above.  The general limits of the right to freedom of association with Lashkar-e-Tayyiba are reasonable, necessary and proportionate, and are in the interests of public safety and national security, after taking into consideration the direct and indirect terrorist activities of the organisation, which threaten human life, as detailed in the Statement of Reasons (at Attachment B).

 

The Criminal Code offences in Division 102 applying to terrorist organisations do not target any specific religious or ethnic group and are designed to promote security and protect all members of the community from the threat of terrorism, regardless of national or ethnic origins or religious beliefs.

 

The information in the Statement of Reasons (Attachment B) supports the Attorney-General's decision made on reasonable grounds, that Lashkar-e-Tayyiba satisfies the criteria for listing as a terrorist organisation under subsection 102.1(2) of the Criminal Code. 

 

There are safeguards and accountability mechanisms in the Act providing for consultation and enabling review of Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) specifying an organisation as a terrorist organisation.  These measures include the following:

 

*         the Commonwealth must consult with the States and Territories in accordance with the Inter-Governmental Agreement on Counter-Terrorism Laws.  The Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) may only be made if a majority of the States and Territories do not object to the regulation within a reasonable time

 

*         under subsection 102.1(2A) the Minister must arrange for the Leader of the Opposition to be briefed in relation to the regulation

 

*         under subsection 102.1(3) the Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) will cease to have effect on the third anniversary of the day on which it takes effect

 

*         subsection 102.1(4) provides that if the Minister ceases to be satisfied of the criteria necessary for listing an organisation under subsection 102.1(2) of the Criminal Code, the Minister must make a declaration to that effect.  The effect of the Minister's declaration is that the organisation is de-listed as a terrorist organisation under Division 102 of the Criminal Code

 

*         subsection 102.1(17) provides that an individual or an organisation may make a de-listing application to the Minister

 

*         the Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) may be reviewed by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security under section 102.1A of the Act, and

 

*         both Houses of Parliament may disallow the Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8) within the applicable disallowance, as provided in subsection 102.1A(4).

 

Conclusion

 

The regulation is compatible with human rights because it advances the protection of human rights, and to the extent that it may also limit human rights, those limitations are reasonable and proportionate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Attachment A

 

Details of the Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8)

 

Section 1 - Name of Regulation

 

This section provides that the title of the Regulation is the Criminal Code Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 8).

 

Section 2 - Commencement

 

This section provides that the Regulation commences on the day after it is registered. 

 

Section 3 - Amendment of Criminal Code Regulations 2002

 

This section provides that Schedule 1 amends the Criminal Code Regulations 2002.

 

Schedule 1 - Amendments

 

Item [1] - Regulation 4V

 

This item substitutes the existing regulation with a new regulation 4V to provide that for paragraph (b) of the definition of 'terrorist organisation' in subsection 102.1(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (the Code), the organisation known as Lashkar-e-Tayyiba is specified. 

 

Subsection 4V(2) provides that for the purposes of subsection (1), Lashkar-e-Tayyiba is also known by the following names: 

 

(a)     al Mansooreen;

(b)    al Mansoorian;

(c)     Army of Medina;

(d)    Army of the Pure;

(e)     Army of the Pure and Righteous;

(f)     Army of the Righteous;

(g)    Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation;

(h)    Idara Khidmat-e-Khalq;

(i)      Jama'at al-Dawa;

(j)      Jama'at-i-Dawat;

(k)    Jamaati-ud-Dawa;

(l)      Jamaat ud-Daawa;

(m)  Jama'at-ud-Da'awa;

(n)    Jama'at-ud-Da'awah;

(o)    Jamaat-ud-Dawa;

(p)    Jama'at ul-Da'awa;

(q)    Jamaat-ul-Dawa;

(r)      Jamaat ul-Dawah;

(s)     Jamaiat-ud-Dawa;

(t)      JuD;

(u)    JUD;

(v)    Lashkar-e-Taiba;

(w)  Lashkar-e-Tayyaba;

(x)    Lashkar-e-Toiba;

(y)    Lashkar-i-Tayyaba;

(z)     Lashkar-i-Toiba;

(za) Lashkar-Tayyiba;

(zb) LeT;

(zc) LT;

(zd) Paasban-e-Ahle-Hadis;

(ze) Paasban-e-Kashmir;

(zf) Paasban-i-Ahle-Hadith;

(zg) Party of the Calling;

(zh) Party of Preachers;

(zi)  Pasban-e-Ahle-Hadith;

(zj)  Pasban-e-Kashmir;

(zk) Soldiers of the Pure;

(zl)  Tehreek-e-Tahafuz Qibla Awal.


Attachment B

 

Lashkar-e-Tayyiba

Also known as: al Mansooreen; al Mansoorian; Army of Medina;

Army of the Pure; Army of the Pure and Righteous; Army of the Righteous; Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation; Idara Khidmat-e-Khalq; Jama'at al-Dawa; Jama'at-i-Dawat; Jamaati-ud-Dawa; Jamaat ud-Daawa; Jama'at-ud-Da'awa;

Jama'at-ud-Da'awah; Jamaat-ud-Dawa; Jama'at ul-Da'awa;

Jamaat-ul-Dawa; Jamaat ul-Dawah; Jamaiat-ud- Dawa; JuD; JUD;

Lashkar-e-Taiba; Lashkar-e-Tayyaba; Lashkar-e-Toiba; Lashkar-i-Tayyaba; Lashkar-i-Toiba; Lashkar-Tayyiba; LeT; LT; Paasban-e-Ahle-Hadis;

Paasban-e-Kashmir; Paasban-i-Ahle- Hadith; Party of the Calling;

Party of Preachers; Pasban-e-Ahle-Hadith; Pasban-e-Kashmir;

Soldiers of the Pure; and Tehreek-e-Tahafuz Qibla Awal.

 

The following information is based on publicly available details about Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT).  To the Australian Government's knowledge, these details are accurate and reliable and have been corroborated by classified information. 

Basis for listing a terrorist organisation

Division 102 of the Criminal Code provides that for an organisation to be listed as a terrorist organisation, the Attorney-General must be satisfied on reasonable grounds that the organisation:

(a)    is directly or indirectly engaged in, preparing, planning, or assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act (whether or not a terrorist act has occurred or will occur); or

(b)   advocates the doing of a terrorist act (whether or not a terrorist act has occurred or will occur).

Details of the organisation

Objectives

LeT is a Sunni Islamic extremist organisation based in Pakistan that uses violence in pursuit of its stated objective of uniting Indian administered Kashmir (IAK) with Pakistan under a radical interpretation of Islamic law. LeT's broader objectives include to establish an Islamic Caliphate across the Indian subcontinent, and to reclaim all 'occupied Muslim lands' in southern Spain and the Balkans. To this end, LeT intends to pursue the 'liberation', not only of Muslim-majority Kashmir, but of all India's Muslim population, even in areas where they do not form a majority. LeT has declared that democracy is antithetical to Islamic law and that LeT's jihad requires it to work toward turning Pakistan itself into a purely Islamic state.

LeT was formed circa 1989as the military wing of the Pakistan-based Islamist fundamentalist movement Markaz al-Dawa wal Irshad (MDI - meaning Centre for Religious Learning and Propagation) and also known as the Jamaat al-Daawa). Originally formed to wage militant jihad against the occupation of Afghanistan by the Soviet Union, LeT shifted its focus to the insurgency in IAKin the 1990s, after Soviet troops withdrew from Afghanistan.


In 2002, LeT was banned by the Pakistani government but the group continues to operate in Pakistan under the alias Jamaat ud-Dawa (JuD). Ostensibly created as a charitable organisation by LeT founder Hafiz Muhammad Saeed immediately prior to LeT being banned, JuD functions as a front organisation for LeT in order to mask its activities and to continue to solicit funds.  The United Nations (UN) Security Council listed JuD as an LeT alias on 10 December 2008.

While IAK and broader Indian interests remain LeT's primary focus, there is always a potential for splinter groups to emerge who want to re-focus their activities and bring them more into line with al-Qa'ida's 'global jihad' against the US and Israel and their allies. However, LeT's primary objective remains the 'liberation' of Muslims in IAK.

Leadership

The recognised leader of LeT, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed was arrested in February 2006 for leading violent protests in response to a Danish newspaper publishing cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad. Many Muslims worldwide considered the cartoons blasphemous.

He was arrested again in August 2006 in the wake of British police disrupting a plot by British citizens to detonate explosives on multiple airplanes mid-flight en route from London to the United States. He has since been detained and subsequently released by Pakistani authorities on several occasions.

On 10 December 2008, the United Nations (UN) Security Council 1267 Committee approved the addition of Hafiz Muhammad Saeed to its consolidated list of individuals and entities subject to assets freeze, travel bans and arms embargo measures. Also in December 2008, the then US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, identified Saeed as responsible for the November 2008 attacks in Mumbai which killed more than 170 people. Rice sought Pakistan's support to apprehend Saeed in relation to his and LeT's links to the attack.  Saeed was detained again, under house arrest, but was released in June 2009 as the Lahore High Court ruled his detention unconstitutional.  Saeed is still considered LeT's leader.

In April 2012, the US State Department announced a US$10 million reward for the capture or information leading to the arrest and conviction of Saeed. As of October 2011, LeT chief of operations Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi continues to communicate with LeT members and co-ordinate LeT activities despite being detained in Central Jail Rawalpindi (commonly known as Adiala Jail) for his leading role in the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Lakhvi was arrested along with several other LeT members on 7 December 2009 and is yet to stand trial. Lakhvi's orders from the jail have included directing LeT fighters to step up violence in the Kashmir Valley.

Membership

LeT's estimated strength is reported to include several hundred trained militants. The majority of LeT's membership consists of jihadists from Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Recruitment and funding

LeT receives funding from donors in the Middle East, mainly Saudi Arabia, and through charitable donations collected from sympathisers in Pakistan, Kashmir, the United Kingdom and Persian Gulf states.


Terrorist activity of the organisation

Directly or indirectly engaged in the doing of terrorist acts

LeT is one of the most active of the Pakistan-based Kashmir-focused militant groups. LeT has directly engaged in, prepared and planned numerous terrorist attacks, including bombings, assassinations and kidnappings against Indian security forces (military and police), government assets, transport and civilians in the disputed territory as well as in India.

Indian and Pakistani initiatives to resolve the Kashmir situation have led to an overall reduction in the level of infiltration and insurgent activity since 2002. However, LeT continues to engage militarily with Indian security forces on a regular basis. Several attacks in IAK have been attributed to the group by Indian authorities, including the massacre of over thirty Hindus in two separate attacks in the Doda and Udhampur districts on 1 May 2006. The attacks occurred two days prior to peace talks between the Indian government and Kashmiri separatist groups, and were condemned by India as an attempt by LeT to sabotage the Kashmir peace process. At least 19 LeT insurgents and ten Indian soldiers died during running clashes in Kupwara district in March-April 2009.  Smaller scale engagements occur on a regular basis, primarily targeting Indian security forces, but also directed against non-Muslim civilians.

LeT is also widely held to have directly engaged in a number of significant attacks in India in recent years.  In November 2008, LeT members killed more than 170 people, including two Australians, in an attack on the Indian financial hub, Mumbai.  Other attacks include the 11 July 2006 serial bombings on trains in Mumbai and the 29 October 2005 serial explosions at marketplaces in New Delhi, which together killed more than 260 people. While two little-known groups claimed responsibility for the Mumbai and New Delhi attacks, subsequent investigations have led Indian authorities to conclude LeT was behind both attacks.

Significant attacks for which responsibility has been claimed by or reliably attributed to the LeT include:

Directly or indirectly preparing and/or planning terrorist acts

LeT operates a number of camps in Pakistan which provide both religious instruction and military style guerrilla training and support. Since proscribing LeT as a terrorist organisation in 2002, the Pakistani authorities have acted to close some LeT and JuD camps.  A number of LeT training facilities are now smaller in scale, with some being mobile, and are focused on preparing jihadists for low-intensity, hit-and- run type operations, in which the attackers are not expected to survive.

In February 2012, Indian authorities arrested three men - two in South Delhi and one in Jharkhand - for their role in planning attacks against targets in the Chandni Chowk market in New Delhi and in Srinagar, IAK.  According to Indian authorities, a genuine and imminent LeT operation was disrupted. The plan was to use explosives and incendiary components to start a fire and inflict maximum casualties. 

Directly or indirectly assisting in or fostering the doing of terrorist acts

LeT is known to have trained foreigners to conduct terrorist operations. British citizens trained by LeT include Richard Reid, who tried to blow up a trans-Atlantic flight in 2001, and Dhiren Barot, who was convicted in 2006 of planning a bombing in London. Investigations indicate one of the British-born suicide bombers responsible for the 7 July 2005 attacks in London, Shehzad Tanweer, may have received training at a LeT camp in Pakistan. LeT is also suspected of providing some funding and logistical support to the disrupted British trans-Atlantic plane bombing plot in August 2006 using JuD as a cover. 

Several individuals with links to LeT have been arrested in Australia, the US, and Canada since 2003 for allegedly planning terrorist activities. In March 2007, a French court convicted a French national, Willie Brigitte, for planning terrorist attacks in Australia in 2003 in conjunction with suspected LeT chief for external operations, Sajid Mir. Brigitte's Australian associate, Faheem Khalid Lodhi, was also convicted of planning acts of terrorism by a New South Wales Supreme Court jury in June 2006; in June 2008, Lodhi lost an appeal to the High Court of Australia to have his case overturned.

In 2009, Sajid Mir worked with now-detained US extremist David Headley on an aborted plot to attack a newspaper office in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Australian citizen David Hicks has admitted to attending an LeT training camp in Kashmir in and around 2000.  Aside from facilitating training, it is not clear whether LeT sanctioned the terrorist activities of any of these foreign-born individuals.

Advocating the doing of terrorist acts

In October 2006, LeT issued a fatwa asking the Muslim community to kill Pope Benedict XVI, in response to a speech delivered by the Pope on 12 September 2006.

In December 2011, Hafiz Saeed vowed that the jihad to oust Indian forces from Kashmir would continue.

Conclusion

On the basis of the above information, ASIO assesses LeT continues to directly and/or indirectly engage in, prepare, plan, assist, advocate or foster the doing of terrorist acts involving threats to life and serious property damage. This assessment is corroborated by information provided by reliable and credible intelligence sources.

In the course of pursuing its objectives, LeT is known to have committed or threatened action:

Other relevant information

LeT maintains links to the Afghan Taliban and several Pakistani Islamist extremist groups, including the Kashmir-focused terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed and the Sunni sectarian group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. LeT is reported to have been involved with militant Islamists in other places where conflict involving Muslims have arisen, including Bosnia, Chechnya, Kosovo and Afghanistan. In 2004, several LeT operatives were captured by British forces in Iraq.

LeT is not engaged in any peace or mediation process.

LeT is listed in the UN 1267 Committee's consolidated list and as a proscribed terrorist organisation by the governments of Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, Pakistan and India.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback