Commonwealth Numbered Regulations - Explanatory Statements

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]


INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2007 (NO. 4) (SLI NO 177 OF 2007)

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Select Legislative Instrument 2007 No. 177

 

Issued by authority of the Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer

 

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

 

Income Tax Assessment Amendment Regulations 2007 (No. 4)

 

Section 909‑1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

 

The purpose of the Regulations is to enable entities created under the United Kingdom Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (UK Act) to satisfy the partnership treatment requirements set out in subsection 830‑15(3) of the ITAA 1997. Upon satisfying the partnership treatment requirements and the other general requirements in subsection 830‑15(1) of the ITAA 1997, such an entity would be a foreign hybrid company. As a result, it would be treated as a partnership under Australia’s taxation laws. This would be consistent with the Government’s policy intent in this area.

 

The Government enacted the foreign hybrid rules in Division 830 of the ITAA 1997 specifically to address issues that arose where an entity was treated as a partnership in the foreign country, but as a company in Australia. In such situations, the entity was at risk of being taxed on a wider range of income than was intended under the accruals regime (the controlled foreign companies (CFC) and foreign investment fund (FIF) rules). Such entities were also at risk of double taxation and exposed to significant compliance costs.

 

Under the foreign hybrid rules, entities that satisfied the relevant conditions were eligible for partnership treatment under Australian taxation law. As a result, neither the CFC nor FIF provisions (where so elected) would apply. Division 830 of the ITAA 1997 generally took effect from the 2003‑04 income year, however, taxpayers were given the option of applying the rules from the 200203 income year.

 

Broadly, Division 830 of the ITAA 1997 operates by classifying foreign hybrids into two types: foreign hybrid limited partnerships or foreign hybrid companies. Where an entity is a company, it cannot be a foreign hybrid limited partnership. A UK LLP is a company because, under subsection 1(2) of the UK Act, it is constituted as a company (body corporate). For this reason, it cannot be a foreign hybrid limited partnership, but may be a foreign hybrid company.

 

In order to qualify as a foreign hybrid company, the company (in addition to other general requirements) must satisfy certain partnership treatment requirements.

 

In the case of a company that is not a United States Limited Liability Company, it must satisfy the partnership treatment requirements set out in subsection 830‑15(3) of the ITAA 1997. These are that the company must have been formed in a foreign country (paragraph 830‑15(3)(a)) and be treated as a partnership under the laws of that country relating to tax imposed by that country (paragraph 830‑15(3)(b)).

 

In the case of a UK LLP, from a taxation perspective, section 118ZA of the United Kingdom Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 taxes the business of the UK LLP as if it were carried on by partners in partnership, rather than by a company.

 

There is also an additional requirement for eligibility under Australian taxation law, which is that there must be regulations in place setting out any particular requirements the entity must satisfy for the income year. The absence of regulations to date has meant that a UK LLP is ineligible for treatment as a foreign hybrid company.

 

The Regulations specify that, for the purposes of paragraph 830‑15(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 (which provides for regulations to set out partnership treatment requirements relating to a foreign company), in order to be a foreign hybrid company, the company would have to be a limited liability partnership under the UK Act. It is not necessary for the Regulations to specify any further requirements. An entity treated as a LLP under the UK Act is a body corporate, thereby satisfying paragraph 830‑15(3)(a). Further, because the UK Act provides that it is the partners who are taxed for the purposes of UK income and capital gains tax, such a company would also satisfy paragraph 830‑15(3)(b).

 

Where the company is a limited liability partnership under the UK Act and satisfies the requirements specified in paragraphs 830‑15(3)(a) and (b) of the ITAA 1997, it will satisfy the partnership treatment requirements. Where a company satisfies both the partnership treatment requirements and the other general requirements in subsection 830-15(1), it will be a foreign hybrid company. For Australian taxation purposes, a foreign hybrid company is treated as a partnership.

 

Pursuant to subsection 830‑15(4) of the ITAA 1997, regulations cannot set out the partnership treatment requirements for any income year before the one in which the regulations were made. Therefore, the Regulations will apply for the 2006‑07 income year. In the case of a taxpayer that has a substituted accounting period (SAP), the relevant ‘income year’ will be the SAP in relation to the 2006‑07 income year.

 

A Regulation Impact Statement was not required. Compliance costs were assessed as low.

 

Targeted, confidential consultation was undertaken in the development of the Regulations.

 

The Regulations commenced on the day after they were registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 


[Index] [Related Items] [Search] [Download] [Help]