Victorian Bills Explanatory Memoranda

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


TRANSPORT LEGISLATION (FURTHER MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS) BILL 2005

  Transport Legislation (Further Miscellaneous
              Amendments) Bill

                        Introduction Print

              EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM


                              Clause Notes

              PART 1--PRELIMINARY MATTERS
Clause 1   states the purposes of the Bill, which are to make amendments to
           the Melbourne City Link Act 1995, the Mitcham-Frankston
           Project Act 2004, the Public Transport Competition Act 1995,
           the Rail Corporations Act 1996, the Road Management Act
           2004, the Road Safety Act 1986 and the Transport Act 1983.

Clause 2   provides for the commencement of the various clauses in the Bill.

PART 2--AMENDMENTS TO THE MELBOURNE CITY LINK
                   ACT 1995
Clause 3   makes minor statute law revisions to the Melbourne City Link
           Act 1995.
           Clause 3(1)(a) substitutes "Director" in the heading to section 6B
           of the Melbourne City Link Act 1995 with "Roads
           Corporation", to reflect previous amendments to section 6B made
           by section 5(2) of the Transport Legislation (Miscellaneous
           Amendments) Act 2004, which abolished the statutory office of
           Director, Melbourne City Link and conferred the Director's
           functions and powers on the Roads Corporation.
           Clause 3(1)(b) rectifies a typographical error in section 11(1) of
           the Melbourne City Link Act 1995 by substituting an upper
           case "L" in "Translink Operations Pty Ltd", so that it correctly
           reads "TransLink Operations Pty Ltd". The reference to this
           company in section 11(1) is now consistent with that in
           section 12B(1).




                                      1
551374                                      BILL LA INTRODUCTION 19/10/2005

 


 

Clause 3(1)(c) amends section 78(1) of the Melbourne City Link Act 1995, which allows an enforcement agency to act on a request from a relevant corporation (as defined in section 3) for the enforcement agency to send a request for payment of a toll in respect of the use of a vehicle in a toll zone to the person who appears to be liable to pay the toll. The amendment reflects the fact that, as the result of amendments made to the Act by section 11(3) of the Transport Legislation (Amendment) Act 2004, such a request would be made under section 77(1)(b)(i), not under section 77(1)(a). Clause 3(1)(d) amends section 80(2)(b)(ii) of the Melbourne City Link Act 1995, which allows for an infringement notice for a tolling offence to be served on a person who has been nominated as the driver of the vehicle by the owner of the vehicle (as defined in section 69 of the Act), who would otherwise have been liable for a tolling offence under the "owner onus" provisions of the Act. The amendments reflect the facts that-- · this nomination may occur under section 72(3) of the Act as well as section 87(3); · owing to amendments made to the Act by section 11(3) of the Transport Legislation (Amendment) Act 2004 the nomination would not be made under section 77(1)(b)(ii); and · this nomination may occur under paragraphs (a), (aab) or (ab) of section 87(3) and not just paragraph (a) of that section. Clause 3(1)(e) removes the reference in section 87(5) of the Melbourne City Link Act 1995 to section 77(1)(b)(ii), which was removed from the Act by section 11(3) of the Transport Legislation (Amendment) Act 2004. Clause 3(2) inserts new section 73(3B) into the Melbourne City Link Act 1995, which clarifies that "invoice" in section 73(3A) means a request for payment of a toll and any associated toll administration fee. This ensures consistency with terminology used in the rest of the Act. 2

 


 

PART 3--AMENDMENTS TO THE MITCHAM-FRANKSTON PROJECT ACT 2004 Clause 4 gives effect to the Government's announcement on 23 March 2005 that the Mitcham-Frankston Freeway, which is the main component of the Mitcham-Frankston Project, would be known as "EastLink". Sub-clauses (1), (2), (3), (4)(a) to (4)(d) and (4)(f) replace references throughout the Mitcham- Frankston Project Act 2004 to "Mitcham-Frankston", "the Mitcham-Frankston Freeway", "Mitcham-Frankston Freeway" and "Freeway" with "EastLink". Sub-clause (4)(e) makes minor amendments to sections 205(1) and 219(1) of the Mitcham-Frankston Project Act 2004, substituting a lower case "f" in "that Freeway", so that it reads "that freeway". "that Freeway" is a reference to the Mitcham- Frankston Freeway which is referred to earlier in those sections. Given that the title of the freeway has now changed, use of the proper noun "Freeway" is no longer appropriate. Sub-clause (5) amends section 198(4) of the Mitcham- Frankston Project Act 2004 so that the reference to a "freeway agreement" is changed to "freeway use agreement". The word "use" was inadvertently omitted when this provision was inserted by section 21(3) of the Mitcham-Frankston Project (Amendment) Act 2005. Clause 5 inserts a savings provision into the Mitcham-Frankston Project Act 2004 to ensure that the change made to the name of the Act by the Bill has automatic effect in all documents. PART 4--AMENDMENTS TO THE PUBLIC TRANSPORT COMPETITION ACT 1995 Clause 6 inserts a new section 3B into the Public Transport Competition Act 1995. The new section provides further clarity about the meaning of "regular passenger service" for the purposes of the Act. Clause 7 amends section 20(2) of the Public Transport Competition Act 1995 to make provision for expanded grounds for possible disciplinary action against a person who is, or who has been, an accredited person. The amendments provide that there will now be proper cause for taking action if the person has acted recklessly or has failed to comply with a condition prescribed under section 10(1)(b) of the Act that requires the person to do any of the things listed in the proposed section 20(2)(d) which is inserted by the clause. 3

 


 

Clause 8 amends section 25 of the Public Transport Competition Act 1995 to establish an additional offence concerning regular passenger services under the Act. PART 5--AMENDMENTS TO THE RAIL CORPORATIONS ACT 1996 Clause 9 amends various provisions of the Rail Corporations Act 1996 to make provision for the change of name of Spencer Street Station to Southern Cross Station and of the Spencer Street Station Authority to the Southern Cross Station Authority. Clause 10 amends section 60(1) of the Rail Corporations Act 1996, which confers on a person to whom the section applies who operates and maintains railway track the power to require the felling and removal of, or to fell and remove, any tree or wood on grounds relating to the safety of a railway track operated or maintained by the person. The amendments-- · replace the existing prescriptive criteria for the exercise of these powers with the broad criterion that the tree or wood poses a risk to the safety of anyone on, or using, the railway track; and · exempt any person felling or removing any tree or wood under the section from the need to obtain a permit under any relevant planning scheme under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Similar amendments are made by clause 32 of this Bill to an equivalent provision in the Transport Act 1983. Clause 11 makes transitional amendments to the Rail Corporations Act 1996 in relation to the amendments effected by clause 9, namely the change of name of Spencer Street Station to Southern Cross Station and the change of name of the Spencer Street Station Authority to the Southern Cross Station Authority. The clause inserts new sections 116, 117 and 118 into the Rail Corporations Act. Clause 12 makes consequential changes to the Borrowing and Investment Powers Act 1987, the Docklands Act 1991, the Transport Act 1983 and the Victorian Urban Development Authority Act 2003 arising from the amendments effected by clause 9, namely the change of name of Spencer Street Station to Southern Cross Station and the change of name of the Spencer Street Station Authority to the Southern Cross Station Authority. 4

 


 

PART 6--AMENDMENTS TO THE ROAD MANAGEMENT ACT 2004 Clause 13 makes similar amendments to the Road Management Act 2004 as those made by clause 4, so that the relevant provisions now refer to EastLink rather than to the Mitcham Frankston Freeway. Clause 14 repeals Part 8 of the Road Management Act 2004, which made consequential and related amendments to other Acts. With the exception of section 179, the provisions of Part 8 have served their purpose. They are therefore redundant and can be repealed. Section 179 gives effect to Schedule 10, which contains transitional provisions related to certain gas projects. Those transitional provisions need to continue in operation. Because section 179 is being repealed along with the rest of Part 8, it is necessary for clause 6 to also amend section 135 so that it gives effect to Schedule 10. PART 7--AMENDMENTS TO THE ROAD SAFETY ACT 1986 Clause 15 inserts new section 14(1A) into the Road Safety Act 1986, to enable a member of the police force or an authorised VicRoads officer to issue a warning or vehicle defect notice, or impose conditions on or prohibit the use of a heavy vehicle, if he or she reasonably suspects, on the basis of information derived from a prescribed engine management system reading device that is operated in the prescribed manner, that the vehicle does not comply with the Road Safety Act 1986 or regulations made under that Act. Under Part 9 of the Road Safety Act 1986, Police and VicRoads officers are able to use equipment to download data recorded on a heavy vehicle's engine management system to determine whether the Road Safety Act 1986 or the regulations made under the Act are being complied with. A heavy vehicle's engine management system records information about its operation with respect to speed, mileage, fuel consumption, idle time, total engine hours and running history. Engine management system reading devices also detect tampering with vehicle equipment, including speed limiting devices. The information produced by these devices can therefore assist in determining whether speed limiting devices which are required to be carried on heavy vehicles are working effectively or have been tampered with. 5

 


 

It is intended that trained members of the police force and VicRoads officers would attach engine management system reading devices to heavy vehicles and download information at the roadside, for example, when the vehicle is at a weighbridge. The information would reveal whether the vehicle's speed limiting device is working properly or whether it has been tampered with, rendering the vehicle unroadworthy and providing grounds for a defect notice to be issued under section 14(1) of the Road Safety Act 1986. Heavy vehicles could be screened in this way to ensure that speed limiting devices are functioning properly, rather than relying on catching heavy vehicles in the act of speeding, as is currently required. It is very difficult to determine whether a speed limiting device has been tampered with from a mere physical examination of the vehicle, as opposed to using a device to download information. Section 14(1) of the Road Safety Act 1986 currently requires that non-compliance be "discovered" before a member of the police force or an authorised VicRoads officer can issue a warning or vehicle defect notice, or impose conditions on or prohibit the use of a heavy vehicle. This sets too high a standard in circumstances where the officer is relying on data produced by an engine management system reading device. While the officer will be able to infer that a speed limiting device is not operating effectively or has been tampered with from readings produced by such a device, he or she will not be able to pinpoint the precise cause of the problem or precisely how the speed limiting device has been tampered with. This amendment should be read in conjunction with clause 19, which allows for regulations to be made prescribing these engine management system reading devices and the procedures and methods to be employed in the use of them. Clause 16 inserts section 79A into the Road Safety Act 1986, which provides that when a prescribed engine management system reading device is used in accordance with the regulations, it must be presumed, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, that the information produced by the device is a true representation of the information held in the heavy vehicle's engine management system. This will apply in circumstances where information held in a heavy vehicle's engine management system is relevant to criminal proceedings (for example, a charge of tampering with specified equipment under section 70 of the Road Safety Act 1986) or for any purpose under the Road Safety Act 1986 (for example, issuing a warning or vehicle defect notice, or imposing conditions on or prohibiting the use of a heavy vehicle under section 14(1)). 6

 


 

This amendment should also be read in conjunction with clause 19, which allows for regulations to be made prescribing these engine management system reading devices and the procedures and methods to be employed in the use of them. Clause 17 inserts section 89(8) into the Road Safety Act 1986, which provides that despite anything to the contrary in section 89, the fact that a person-- · has paid an infringement penalty, or · has been found guilty, participated in a diversion program or had a conviction imposed by a court in respect of an infringement for which an infringement notice was served-- may be recorded and used to exclude the person from a scheme to provide discounted fees to good drivers. The Government has announced that people with a good driving record will be entitled to a discount on their driver licence renewal fees. This amending provision is needed to override the effect of sections 89(1)(a) and 89(4) of the Act. Section 89(1)(a) has the effect that, if an infringement penalty is paid, then the infringement cannot be held against the person for other purposes. Section 89(4) provides that a conviction recorded by a court in respect of an infringement (where the infringement notice has not been withdrawn) must not be taken into account for any purpose other than the making of the conviction itself or any appeal proceedings. A person who has received an infringement notice for an offence which is included in the list of offences which would ordinarily disqualify him or her from the good driver licence fee discount should not be able to retain that discount by paying the infringement penalty. A conviction in respect of that infringement should also disqualify him or her from this scheme. There is precedent for this approach in sections 89(5) and 89(6), which allow infringements to be taken into account for the purposes of the imposition of demerit points and the heavy vehicle registration suspension scheme respectively. 7

 


 

Clause 18 substitutes section 92(3)(h) of the Road Safety Act 1986, so that information held by VicRoads (that is, from its vehicle registration and driver licencing database) may be disclosed to an enforcement agency in another jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing an infringement penalty for an offence allegedly committed by a Victorian in that jurisdiction. This is achieved by sub-paragraph (iii) of the new section 92(3)(h). Sub-paragraphs (i) and (ii) of new section 92(3)(h) only repeat the wording of existing section 92(3)(h) in a manner which is easier to follow and is consistent with the formatting of section 92(3)(e). Section 92(3)(h) currently allows VicRoads to disclose information in accordance with an agreement between a Victorian Minister and a Minister in another jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing a judgement or order of a court in a prosecution. This does not include infringement penalties, as the issuing and enforcement of infringement notices occurs outside the formal court process. By contrast, under section 92(3)(e) of the Road Safety Act 1986, VicRoads may disclose information for the purposes of the enforcement by a Victorian law enforcement agency of judgments and orders of courts in their criminal jurisdiction or infringement penalties. There is no reason in principle why the disclosure of information for enforcement of infringement penalties should not also be made to other jurisdictions' law enforcement agencies. In this regard, it should be noted that the provision of this information to other jurisdictions would be subject to the same safeguards as apply to any information provided under section 92 of the Road Safety Act 1986. This means that it would only be provided if the recipients had signed a confidentiality agreement under section 92(4) specifying the use to which the information can be put, compliance with which is subject to independent annual audit. In addition, it is an offence under section 92 for a person who obtains information under a confidentiality agreement to disclose or use the information for a purpose other than that specified in the agreement, or to use information knowing it to have been disclosed or used in contravention of section 92 or a confidentiality agreement. 8

 


 

Clause 19 inserts new items 38A and 38B into Schedule 2 to the Road Safety Act 1986, which contains the subject matter for the making of regulations under the Act. Item 38A enables regulations to be made prescribing engine management system reading devices, the handling, storage, use and maintenance of those devices, and the precautions to be taken and the procedures and methods to be employed in the use of those devices for ensuring that they give accurate and reliable results. This is similar to the regulation making power regarding breath analysing equipment in item 51. Item 38B enables regulations to be made for the way in which images or messages from the devices are to be dealt with-- specifically, how they will be processed, stored, transferred, produced, re-configured or used to produce other forms of images or messages. This is similar to the regulation making power regarding safety cameras in item 39A. PART 8--AMENDMENTS TO THE TOBACCO (AMENDMENT) ACT 2005 Clause 20 amends section 27 of the Tobacco (Amendment) Act 2005 to substitute a new definition of "occupier" in the proposed new section 222A of the Transport Act 1983 that is to be inserted into that Act by section 27. PART 9--AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSPORT ACT 1983 Part 9 of the Bill makes a number of unrelated amendments to the Transport Act 1983. Division 1--Regulation of Entitlement to Use Public Transport Services Division 1 amends the Transport Act 1983 so as to permit the main elements of public transport ticketing law to be re-framed and consolidated in regulations, to re-cast a number of key offence provisions and to make changes to the way in which conditions under which public transport services can be used may be determined. Clause 21 amends section 208 of the Transport Act 1983 so as to insert a definition of "public transport service". This introduces a key new concept to Part VII of the Act which will permit both the Act and the regulations to deal more comprehensively and flexibly with this subject matter. The clause also consequentially repeals the definition of "ticket" and amends the definition of "ticket offence". 9

 


 

Division 2--Amendments Concerning Authorised Officers Clause 22 makes a consequential change to the heading of Division 4 of Part VII of the Transport Act 1983. Clause 23 inserts new sections 220A to 220D into the Transport Act 1983. New section 220A replaces and strengthens the existing section 221(5) covering fraudulent and similar activities. New section 220B introduces new offences of counterfeiting a ticket or other thing that can be used to prove an entitlement to use a public transport service and of altering a ticket or other such thing with the intention of obtaining a benefit to which the person concerned is not entitled. The introduction of these offences closes a gap in the existing enforcement regime for public transport. New section 220C replaces an existing offence relating to wrongfully claiming or taking the benefit of an exemption or concession. New section 220D replaces the existing regime for determining ticket conditions under section 221(1A) and (1B) of the Transport Act 1983. Significant differences are that, under the new provision-- · The conditions are characterised more broadly as conditions to which an entitlement to use a specified public transport service provided by a passenger transport company or a bus company is to be subject. · The conditions are to be determined and published in the Government Gazette by the Director of Public Transport. · It is made clear that conditions made under this provision can apply to entitlements that exist, but have not been exercised, before the relevant conditions are published. This is to ensure that, for example, new conditions can apply to tickets which have been sold, but which have not been used, before the conditions were determined and published. 10

 


 

Clause 24 repeals a number of sub-sections of section 221 of the Transport Act 1983 and section 225A of that Act. Of these, section 221(1A), (1B), and (5) and section 225A are being replaced by new provisions to be inserted by this Bill. Section 221(2), (3), (4), (4A) and (6) are proposed to be replaced by new regulations made under the regulation-making powers to be inserted into the Transport Act 1983 by clause 25. Clause 25 replaces the existing section 221AA of the Transport Act 1983 with a new section which establishes a comprehensive set of empowering provisions to support regulations in relation to the use of public transport services. It is intended that the substance of existing section 221AA will be covered by regulations made under the new section. Some key elements which will be able to be addressed by regulations made under the new section include-- · regulating entitlement to use a public transport service; for example requiring the obtaining and validation of a ticket as a means of obtaining an entitlement to use such a service and requiring that such a ticket be produced on demand or surrendered; · clarifying the contractual relationships between various parties involved in the provision and use of public transport services; · providing for the ascertainment of whether a person using, or who has used, a public transport service was entitled to do so and providing for the inspection and reading and testing of tickets and other documents. Division 2--Amendments Concerning Authorised Officers Division 2 makes a number of amendments to the Transport Act 1983 so as to make it possible for the Bus Association Victoria to be accredited to employ or engage authorised officers and for people so employed or engaged to be authorised as authorised officers, to make it clear that the authorisation of an authorised officer may be limited and to make clear the scope of the powers of authorised officers employed or engaged by passenger transport companies, bus companies and (if it becomes accredited) the Bus Association Victoria. 11

 


 

Clause 26 inserts a definition of "Bus Association Victoria" into section 2 of the Transport Act 1983. Clause 27 makes a large number of substantive and consequential amendments to the Transport Act 1983 intended to make it possible for the Bus Association Victoria to be accredited to employ or engage authorised officers and for people so employed or engaged to be authorised as authorised officers and to ensure that a person so employed or engaged may, if authorised to do so, bring proceedings for ticket offences. Clause 28 corrects 2 references in section 221C of the Transport Act 1983 consequential upon amendments made by the Transport (Rights and Responsibilities) Act 2003. Clause 29 inserts new sections 221CB and 221CC into the Transport Act 1983. New section 221CB provides that the Secretary or the Director of Public Transport may limit the powers and functions which may be exercised by an authorised officer. The section also requires that, if the scope of a person's authorisation is so limited, he or she must be given written details of the limitations and provides that the limitations only take effect when the person receives those details. New section 221CC makes it an offence for a person whose authorisation is subject to a limit imposed under section 221CB to knowingly exercise, or attempt to exercise, a power or function in contravention of that limit, and sets a maximum penalty of 10 penalty units for that offence. Clause 30 inserts new section 221FA into the Transport Act 1983 which makes it clear that an authorised officer may exercise his or her powers in, or in relation to, a vehicle or any land, building or other property of a passenger transport company or a bus company regardless of whether or not he or she is employed or engaged by that company. 12

 


 

Division 3--Other Miscellaneous Amendments Division 3 makes a number of unrelated amendments to the Transport Act 1983. Clause 31 amends section 9 of the Transport Act 1983, which sets out functions and powers of the Director of Public Transport. Sub-clause (1) makes a number of unrelated amendments to section 9(2). These amendments-- · remove the requirement for the powers and functions specified in sub-section (2) to be exercised subject to the approval of the Minister (section 9(5) already requires the Director to comply with any directions given by the Minister); · insert a number of additional paragraphs into the sub- section which are intended to clarify the powers of the Director to give indemnities, guarantees, releases and charges and anything else of a similar nature and the powers of the Director in relation to intellectual property rights. Sub-clause (2) inserts a new sub-section (8) into section 9 which deems the Director to have been authorised to exercise any of the powers referred to in the second dot point above that were exercised by the Director before the commencement of this clause. Clause 32 amends section 9C of the Transport Act 1983 which confers on the Director of Public Transport powers to require the felling and removal of, or to fell and remove, any tree or wood on grounds relating to the safety of a railway track operated or maintained by the Director on behalf of the Crown. The amendments-- · replace the existing prescriptive criteria for the exercise of these powers with the broad criterion that the tree or wood poses a risk to the safety of anyone on, or using, the railway track; and · exempt any person felling or removing any tree or wood under the section from the need to obtain a permit under any relevant planning scheme under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Similar amendments are made by clause 10 of this Bill to an equivalent provision in the Rail Corporations Act 1996. 13

 


 

Clause 33 amends section 32(1A) of the Transport Act 1983 so as to make it clear that the power of delegation conferred by that sub-section extends to powers conferred on the Secretary to the Department of Infrastructure by regulations made under the Road Safety Act 1986 in relation to section 33 of that Act. Clause 34 makes a number of amendments to section 56 of the Transport Act 1983. Sub-clause (1) replaces paragraphs (b) and (ba) of section 56(1) to provide more comprehensively for the making of regulations relating to conduct in relation to, or in or on, vehicles or places belonging to, or under the control of, Rail Track, the Roads Corporation, a passenger transport company, a rail freight company or a bus company and regulations relating to open containers of liquor or purported liquor. Sub-clause (2) inserts a new paragraph (ga) into section 56(1) to provide for the making of regulations relating to the parking of vehicles on any place belonging to, or under the control of, Rail Track, a passenger transport company, a rail freight company or a bus company. Sub-clause (3) repeals paragraphs (n) and (o) of section 56(1) consequential upon the amendments made by clause 25 of this Bill. Sub-clause (4) inserts a new sub-section (5) into section 56 which clarifies that a reference to parking in the new paragraph (ga), inserted into section 56(1) by sub-clause (2), includes a reference to leaving a vehicle standing. Sub-clause (5) provides that the amendment made by sub- clause (1) does not affect the validity of certain existing Regulations which were, in part, made under the paragraphs replaced by sub-clause (1). Clause 35 amends section 142 of the Transport Act 1983, which relates to hire car licences and special purpose vehicle licences. The amendments have the effect of prohibiting the licensing authority from granting an application for a hire car licence in respect of a hire car that is to be operated from a place in an area specified under the section, unless the licensing authority has had regard to the matters listed in the new paragraph (b) being inserted. 14

 


 

Clause 36 deals with the towing of damaged vehicles from freeways and other roads which are the subject of a declaration under section 119A of the Road Management Act 2004 (that is, which are declared to be sufficiently hazardous to justify being included in the power given by that section to VicRoads to remove stationary vehicles). Clause 36(1) enables tow truck drivers engaged by or on behalf of VicRoads to tow vehicles involved in an accident on freeways or other roads declared to be hazardous to a safe and convenient place near the road, without having to obtain the authorisation from a tow truck allocation centre that would normally be required under section 183B(1) of the Transport Act 1983. This is intended to ensure that damaged vehicles are removed from freeways and other hazardous roads as quickly as possible. Clause 36(2) provides that once the damaged vehicle has been towed to a safe and convenient place near the road in accordance with the power given by clause 36(1) it can only be subsequently towed from that place if that has been authorised by a tow truck allocation centre in accordance with section 183B(1) of the Transport Act 1983. This preserves the operation of the tow truck allocation process once the immediate danger has been removed from the freeway or other hazardous road. Clause 36(3) repeals section 119A(3) of the Road Management Act 2004, which had specifically preserved the requirement under section 183B of the Transport Act 1983 to obtain authorisation from a tow truck allocation centre in circumstances where VicRoads has authorised the removal of a damaged vehicle from an accident on a freeway or other road declared to be hazardous. This provision needs to be repealed, because it is inconsistent with clause 36(1). Clause 37 amends section 215(2) of the Transport Act 1983 so as to enable regulations to be made to deal with situations where a graduated penalty has been imposed on the basis of incorrect information. Clause 38 inserts new paragraph (d) into section 216(6) of the Transport Act 1983, which adds the power to extract or copy information held by a heavy vehicle's engine management system to the list of inspection powers for the purposes of determining whether requirements imposed by or under the Act or any other Act relating to transport are being complied with. 15

 


 

Clause 39 amends section 217A(3) of, and inserts section 217A(4) into, the Transport Act 1983, so that a member of the police or a VicRoads officer who is inspecting a heavy vehicle under that Act may take action under section 14(1) of the Road Safety Act 1986 (that is, issue a warning or vehicle defect notice, or impose conditions on or prohibit the use of the vehicle) if he or she reasonably suspects, on the basis of information derived from a prescribed engine management system reading device which is operated in the prescribed manner, that the vehicle does not comply with the Road Safety Act 1986 or regulations made under that Act. Clause 40 amends section 218B of the Transport Act 1983 relating to the power of an authorised officer or a member of the police force to require a person to state his or her name and address. The amendments to this section-- · require an authorised officer or a member of the police force who is not in uniform who requests a person to state his or her name and address to, without being asked, advise the person of the authorised officer's or member's status as such and name, produce for inspection by the person proof of the authorised officer's or member's status and advise the person that it is an offence to fail to comply with the request or to provide a false name and address; · provide that it is not an offence for a person to fail to comply with a request if the authorised officer or member of the police force does not fully comply with these requirements; · remove an offence made redundant by these amendments; · empower an authorised officer or member of the police force to request a person, who has stated a name and address, to provide evidence of the correctness of the name and address without the existing requirement that the authorised officer or member must suspect on reasonable grounds that the stated name or address may be false. 16

 


 

Clause 41 inserts a new section 220AA into Division 4 of Part VII of the Transport Act 1983 which creates an offence of giving to an authorised officer or a member of the police force or one of a number of other specified classes of person, information that is relevant or possibly relevant for the purposes of the Division (including for the purposes of any relevant regulations) and that the person giving the information knows or believes to be false. The creation of this offence is part of a rationalisation of a number of separate false information offences spread throughout the Act. This provision is specific to Division 4 of Part VII and, because of the subject matter dealt with in that Division, attracts a lower maximum penalty than the proposed main false information offence to be inserted into the Act by clause 43 of this Bill. Clause 42 repeals section 222A of the Transport Act 1983 (which is to be inserted into that Act by the Tobacco (Amendment) Act 2005) as part of a proposal to transfer no smoking offences from the Act to regulations made under the Act. This change is part of a wider restructure of public transport behaviour offences relating to safety and amenity on public transport vehicles and property. Clause 43 inserts a new section 224 into the Transport Act 1983. This provision is to constitute the main offence in the Act in relation to the deliberate or reckless provision of false or misleading information or deliberately or recklessly engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct. It is a wide ranging provision, replacing a number of offences covering similar ground as part of a rationalisation of these offences. Clause 44 is consequential on the amendments made by clauses 43 and 41 and repeals the individual false information offences which are to be replaced by the new sections inserted by those clauses. Clause 45 substitutes section 225 of the Transport Act 1983 in relation to offences concerning assault and obstruction of officers and those assisting officers. The new section widens the scope of the former offence and removes some tautologous words (for instance, "delay" is encompassed by "hinder" and "resist" is encompassed by "obstruct"). Clause 46 substitutes section 225B of the Transport Act 1983, which deals with the impersonation of officers. Clause 47 substitutes section 225C of the Transport Act 1983, which deals with the bribery of officers. 17

 


 

 


[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]