(1) Subject to this
section, where a child is examined in proceedings under this Act without the
leave of the court hearing the proceedings, the evidence resulting from the
examination which relates to the abuse of, or the risk of abuse of, the child
is not admissible in the proceedings.
(2) Where a person
causes a child to be examined for the purpose of deciding —
(a) to
bring proceedings under this Act involving an allegation that the child has
been abused or is at risk of being abused; or
(b) to
make an allegation in proceedings under this Act that the child has been
abused or is at risk of being abused,
subsection (1) does
not apply in relation to evidence resulting from the first examination which
the person caused the child to undergo.
(3) In proceedings
under this Act, the court hearing the proceedings may admit evidence which is
otherwise inadmissible under this section if the court is satisfied that
—
(a) the
evidence relates to relevant matters on which the evidence already before the
court is inadequate; and
(b) the
court will not be able to determine the proceedings properly unless the
evidence is admitted; and
(c) the
welfare of the child concerned is likely to be served by the admission of the
evidence.
(4) In this section
—
examined , in relation to a child, means —
(a)
subjected to a medical procedure; or
(b)
examined or assessed by a psychiatrist or psychologist (other than by a family
counsellor or family consultant).
[Section 217 amended: No. 35 of 2006 s. 124.]