(1) An applicant may
apply to the State Administrative Tribunal for a review, in accordance with
this Part, of a decision of the Commission to refuse to approve any plan,
application for title, transfer, conveyance, lease, licence to use and occupy,
or mortgage, in respect of which an application for approval was made to the
Commission.
(2) An applicant may
apply to the State Administrative Tribunal for a review, in accordance with
this Part, of conditions affixed to the granting of an approval referred to in
subsection (1).
(3) An applicant who
makes a request under section 144(1) or 151(1) may apply to the State
Administrative Tribunal for a review, in accordance with this Part, of a
decision of the Commission made under section 144(2) or 151(2).
(4) An applicant given
approval of a plan of subdivision who is aggrieved by the Commission’s
decision to refuse to endorse its approval on a diagram or plan of survey of
the subdivision submitted to the Commission under section 145 may apply to the
State Administrative Tribunal for a review, in accordance with this Part, of
the decision of the Commission.
(5) If the Commission
refuses to endorse a plan or diagram of survey of a subdivision because a
condition affixed to the approval of the plan of subdivision has not been
complied with, an application under subsection (4) may include an application
for a review of that condition.
(6) An applicant for
an extension under section 145A(2) who is aggrieved by the Commission’s
decision to refuse to grant the extension may apply to the State
Administrative Tribunal for a review, in accordance with this Part, of the
decision of the Commission.
[Section 251 amended: No. 26 of 2020 s. 92.]