(1) The CEO may allege
to the State Administrative Tribunal that there is proper cause for
disciplinary action, as mentioned in subsection (2), against a licence holder.
(2) There is proper
cause for disciplinary action against a licence holder —
(a) if
the licence holder, or where the licence is held by a body corporate, if the
body or any of the body’s officers, as the case may be —
(i)
is the subject of a pending charge for an offence under
this Act; or
(ii)
has breached —
(I) a provision of this Act; or
(II) the licence or a
condition or restriction to which the licence is subject;
or
(iii)
has been convicted of an offence under this Act, a
corresponding law, or any legislation repealed by this Act; or
(iv)
is the subject of a pending charge anywhere in the world
for an offence involving fraud or dishonesty; or
(v)
is not or no longer likely to carry on the activities of
a licence holder honestly and fairly; or
(vi)
is not or no longer a fit and proper person to hold a
licence;
or
(b) if
the licence was issued or renewed in error in consequence of information
provided with the application for the issue or renewal of the licence being
false or misleading in a material particular.
(3) If, in a
proceeding commenced by an allegation under subsection (1) against a licence
holder, the State Administrative Tribunal is satisfied that proper cause
exists for disciplinary action, the State Administrative Tribunal may do any
of the following —
(a)
suspend a licence of any type held by the licence holder for such period, not
exceeding 3 months, as the Tribunal thinks fit;
(b)
revoke a licence of any type held by the licence holder;
(c)
disqualify the licence holder from holding any type of licence for such period
as the Tribunal thinks fit or permanently.