Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation



Documents of Reconciliation

Documents of Reconciliation > Policy > Briefing Paper >

Documents of reconciliation in an international context

Reconciliation is happening in different ways under various names and processes in different countries. The trend toward negotiated, or conciliatory, methods of conflict resolution with Indigenous peoples can be observed in many countries including, Canada, Denmark, South Africa, Ecuador, Brazil, Norway, Finland, United States and New Zealand.

Two of the more important recent developments in other countries are noted here.

  • In Canada on 7 January 1998, the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development made a formal Statement of Reconciliation on behalf of the Government of Canada (Attachment B). The Statement of Reconciliation apologised in particular for the role played by the government in the development and administration of residential schools which were set up to assimilate Indians into the dominant culture. The apology was accompanied by a Can$350 million healing fund for community counselling and treatment and a number of other concrete commitments.

  • The South African Constitution of 1996 begins with a preamble that acknowledges the injustices of the past and dedicates the nation to building a democratic and open society (Attachment C). Chapter 12 of the Constitution recognises the role and status of traditional leadership according to customary law. It allows for traditional authorities to function within the framework of the South Africa's legal system and states that the courts must apply customary law when it is applicable, subject to the constitution and any legislation that deals with customary law. Traditional leaders have been granted an ex-officio role in local government until April 30 1999.

International Lessons

There are several important issues that arise from the experience of other countries about developing documents of reconciliation:

  • All Commonwealth countries, except Australia, have a history of official treaty-making with their Indigenous peoples;

  • Most other countries have provided recognition for Indigenous peoples in their Constitution;

  • Many other countries have enacted a Bill of Rights for all citizens and which also specifies protection for certain agreed Indigenous rights;

  • Participation of Indigenous peoples in parliamentary processes has been difficult to achieve without the provision of special measures, such as dedicated seats or the introduction of Indigenous local/regional government structures.

  • Regional agreements provide a mechanism for Indigenous people to control specific areas of land and water within the parameters of existing laws and governments;

  • The United Nations Commission on Human Rights is focusing increasing attention on promoting the protection of the rights of Indigenous peoples and empowering them to make choices which enable them to retain their cultural identity while participating in the wider political, economic, cultural and social life of the nation;

  • History demonstrates that Indigenous rights require the protection of legislation to ensure that they are maintained.

Top of the page

Next Page

Home Page