41—Invalidity of by-laws
(1) Subject to this
section, by-laws are invalid to the extent to which they are inconsistent
with—
(a) this
Act or any other Act or subordinate legislation made under this or any other
Act; or
(b)
the scheme description filed with the community plan; or
(c) a
development contract filed with the community plan; or
(d) a
development contract of a secondary or tertiary scheme that comprises part of
the community scheme to which the by-laws relate; or
(e) in
the case of the by-laws of a secondary scheme—
(i)
the scheme description of the primary scheme; or
(ii)
the by-laws of the primary scheme; or
(f) in
the case of the by-laws of a tertiary scheme—
(i)
the scheme descriptions of the primary or
secondary scheme; or
(ii)
the by-laws of the primary or secondary scheme.
(2) A by-law will be
taken to be inconsistent with a scheme description, the by-laws of another
scheme or a development contract if, and only if, there are no circumstances
in which the by-law can operate consistently with the scheme description,
by-laws or development contract. 1
Explanatory Note—
1 For instance if the scheme description provides
that the community lots will be used for residential purposes without
specifying the kinds of residential use, the by-laws may prohibit some kinds
of residential use such as flats or boarding house accommodation but cannot
prohibit all kinds of residential use.